Unilever N.V.
UNA.ASConsumer DefensiveLEI 549300TK7G7NZTVM1Z30
At a glance
- Most recent filing on December 11, 2024 — a trade by Nayager M. on Dec 6, 2024.
- Over the past 90 days: 0 open-market buys.
- This page shows 1 visible filing, of which 0 open-market buys, going back to December 11, 2024.
This buy came out above 69% of all scored insider buys of the past twelve months. A rank, not a forecast.
How the company itself measures up
Four components from the annual figures and the price series, compared with the other companies on the same date. Separate from the filing above, and separate from the question of whether this is a good moment.
On this measurement the company came out above 78% of the companies measured. That says something about the company's numbers, not about its share price.
As of Jul 31, 2026 · methodology 0.4.0
| Component | What is measured | Sub-score | Weight | Compared with |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | gross profit relative to total assets | 35% | all measured companies | |
| Valuation | operating profit relative to the value of the whole business | 30% | all measured companies | |
| Momentum | price return over twelve months, excluding the most recent month | 22% | all measured companies | |
| What goes to shareholders | dividends and share buybacks relative to market value | 13% | all measured companies |
These figures only mean something in comparison: they take on meaning next to the other companies of that same date. See the full ranking →
Price history and buy moments
Every visible filing
What was filed, most recent first. On an award the register reports a price of 0 — nothing was paid — and then the Quantity column tells you how large the filing was.
| Reported | Filed by | Role | Category | Quantity | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2024 | Nayager M. | Chief People Officer (a member of Unilever Leadership Executive) | Other (no signal) | 172.08 | nothing paid |
Follow this company
Loading follow status…
The insider, quant and timing scores stand apart from one another and are meant as context. There is no threshold in them (“above such and such is worth buying”), we do not add them up into a single figure, and none of it is a recommendation. How they are calculated is in the methodology.